Zamir Assadi
When Donald Trump
returned to the White House in 2025, so did one of his hallmark economic tools:
tariffs. Wrapped in stars, stripes, and tough talk about American strength, the
latest wave of tariffs was intended to bring factories back, narrow the trade
deficit, and, once again, “Make America Great.”
Now, with the July 9
grace period nearing its end, Trump said on Tuesday that he was not thinking of
extending the deadline for countries to negotiate trade deals with the US.
Yet, the rising
inflation and growing discomfort among allies suggest that the costs of this
economic nationalism are becoming harder to ignore.
Jobs, Bills, and Less
Growth
Latest findings from report titled “Trade Wars No Winners: Assessing the Global Impact of
US Tariffs” by KTrade Securities show that the results aren’t exactly the
victory lap the US administration was hoping for. The unemployment rate is
projected to be 0.3 percentage points higher than it would be without tariffs,
with 394,000 fewer jobs in the country by year-end. Longer term, labor force
participation and employment could fall further if the tariffs remain in place.
Quite a few American
consumers, too, are feeling the pinch. It is estimated that household
purchasing power has declined by an average of $1,700, as higher import costs
ripple through the economy. As per the Budget Lab at Yale, the 2025 tariffs
have pushed up consumer prices across key goods, with short-run spikes of 33%
for leather products, 28% for apparel, and 13.6% for cars. Even after global
supply shifts, prices remain elevated - up to 18% for leather and 11.9% for
vehicles - adding roughly $5,700 to a new car’s price.
Yearly forecasts also
reflect these domestic headwinds. The International Monetary Fund has
downgraded US GDP growth to 1.8% for 2025, citing tariff tensions and broader
policy uncertainty. Some are even more pessimistic. In its newly released Mid-Year
Market Outlook 2025, J.P. Morgan Research cut its US growth forecast to
1.3%, down from 2.0%.
Friends Don’t Like
Threats
Looming domestic damage
is serious, but its global effects could be even greater. Ali Farid Khwaja,
Chairman of KTrade Securities, warned that current tariff policies are
undermining the pillars of the global economic order - free markets, open
trade, and legal predictability.
Questions arise over
this shift in global posture, which isn’t just reactive but reflects a deeper
loss of confidence in the US-centered international economic framework. “If we
move into a world with no functioning global market, no property rights
protection, and no policy consistency,” Khwaja said, “then every country will
be forced to rethink not just its economic model, but also its trade and
geopolitical relationships. The result isn’t just uncertainty for emerging
markets; it’s systemic confusion for the entire global economy.”
Yearning for stability,
countries are no longer waiting around.
In March, Canada
responded by imposing 25% counter-tariffs on roughly C$30 billion of US
imports, including steel, aluminum and vehicles, sending a clear signal that
Canada won’t simply absorb unilateral US trade pressure. Mexico has taken a
similar path, matching US duties with its own and leaving the door open to
broader countermeasures. Under the constraints of USMCA neither country can
fully decouple, but both are clearly hedging.
Further afield,
Australia is accelerating trade diversification, with less than 5% of its
exports going to the US. Policymakers in Canberra are actively steering
businesses toward Asia, the EU, and the UK, where the UK-Australia Free Trade
Agreement (2023) and the pending EU-Australia deal represent deliberate efforts
to create robust alternatives to US markets.
The UK, meanwhile, has
chosen a strategy of non-retaliation. By refusing to engage in tit-for-tat
tariff wars, London is marketing itself as a stable, rules-based alternative to
an increasingly unpredictable US economy. And in the background, China
continues to strengthen domestic demand and trade deeper into Africa, Asia, and
Europe.
So… Great Again?
There’s no denying that
the tariff strategy has its fans, especially among those who view globalization
as a raw deal for American workers.
In theory, reducing
dependency on foreign rivals and reshoring critical industries makes strategic
sense. But in practice, the numbers tell a different story. On top of that, America’s
trade partners are no longer treating tariffs as a temporary storm, but as a
new normal worth moving beyond, whether through retaliation, diversification,
or quiet withdrawal.
Tariffs might score
political points in the short term, but if the long-term effect is inflation,
isolation, and instability, the
question must be asked: Is America being made great again… or just making
everyone else look for a plan B?