Tuesday, 2 March, 2021
logo
NATION

HoR dissolution against constitution: advocates at hearing



hor-dissolution-against-constitution-advocates-at-hearing

Kathmandu, Jan 17: Advocate Santosh Bhandari has said that the Prime Minister does not have rights to dissolve the House of Representatives, which has a full term of five years. Bhandari said so while speaking on behalf of writ petitioners at the Supreme Court during a hearing on a writ petition against the HoR dissolution that is ongoing at the constitutional bench.

Likewise, advocate Giriraj Bhatta argued that although the then Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala dissolved parliament in 1994, there is no provision in the existing constitution that the lower house would be dissolved without completing its full term.

Advocate Dr Bhimarjun Acharya claimed that the existing constitution does not mention any provision that allows HoR dissolution.

A constitutional bench comprising Chief Justice Cholendra Shamsher JB Rana and Justices Bishwombhar Prasad Shrestha, Anil Kumar Sinha, Sapana Pradhan Malla and Tej Bahadur KC recently directed a hearing on the issue at the constitutional bench. Hearing on the matter has entered the content from today.

Advocate Prabesh KC on behalf of the dissolved HoR members Dev Prasad Gurung, Krishna Bhakta Pokharel, Shashi Shrestha and Ram Kumari Jhakri had filed a writ petition against the HoR dissolution by President on the recommendation of Prime Minister on 20 December. Defendants in the writ petition are the President, the Office of Prime Minister and Council of Ministers and Speaker of the dissolved HoR.

Likewise, senior advocate Dinesh Tripathi and advocates Shalik Ram Sapkota, Gyanendra Raj Aaran, Samrit Kharel, Kanchan Krishna Neupane, Santosh Bhandari, Dipak Rai, Amita Gautam, Lokendra Bahadur Oli, Kamal Bahadur Khatri, Maniram Upadhyay, Tulasi Simkhada and Achyut Prasad Kharel had separately filed a writ petition against the HoR dissolution in the apex court.

How do you feel after reading this news?